Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:12045 comp.os.msdos.programmer:4199 comp.unix.internals:2415 comp.unix.sysv386:6269 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!uudell!mustang.dell.com!jrh From: jrh@mustang.dell.com (Randy Howard) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Dos and unix on same Disk Message-ID: <17073@uudell.dell.com> Date: 24 Mar 91 14:44:47 GMT References: <13719@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Sender: news@uudell.dell.com Reply-To: jrh@mustang.dell.com (Randy Howard) Followup-To: comp.sys.att Distribution: na Organization: Dell Computer Corp. Lines: 30 In article <13719@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>, justicec@handel.cs.colostate.edu (Christopher Justice) writes: |> I'm having a problem installing both AT+T System V R3.2.2 and Dos 4.0 on the |> same disk drive. I partioned the drive (330 meg) into an 80 meg Dos |> partition and the rest for unix. They installed succesfully, but Dos gives |> me a "General failure reading drive C:" when I try to run programs. This |> happens irregularly. Unix has given me a couple of "unrequested harddrive |> interrupt errors". |> |> Our computer Vendor is trying to tell us that you can not install unix |> and dos on the same drive, or possibly that dos can not take up more than |> 9% of the drive. I find this hard to believe. If Dos and unix are on |> different partitions, it shouldn't matter. |> |> Is using Dos and unix on the same drive common? Can you do this? I'd like |> to hear about your experience with doing this. |> Very common. We ship a large percentage of our pre-installed UNIX systems w/DOS partitions. Both the 3.2 and V4 products support DOS partitions; at boot time you can select which one you wish to come up on (default to UNIX). I would say your vendor is probably confused. |> Thank you! |> |> Chris Justice |> justicec@cs.colostate.edu -- Randy Howard !'s:uunet!dell!mustang!jrh Dell Computer Corp. @'s:jrh@mustang.dell.com