Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:12050 comp.os.msdos.programmer:4222 comp.unix.internals:2419 comp.unix.sysv386:6307 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!netcom!cmilono From: cmilono@netcom.COM (Carlo Milono) Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Dos and unix on same Disk Message-ID: <1991Mar25.173644.3583@netcom.COM> Date: 25 Mar 91 17:36:44 GMT References: <13719@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> Distribution: na Organization: Netcom - Somewhere in the S.F. Bay Area Lines: 35 In article <13719@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> justicec@handel.cs.colostate.edu (Christopher Justice) writes: >I'm having a problem installing both AT+T System V R3.2.2 and Dos 4.0 on the >same disk drive. I partioned the drive (330 meg) into an 80 meg Dos >partition and the rest for unix. They installed succesfully, but Dos gives >me a "General failure reading drive C:" when I try to run programs. This >happens irregularly. Unix has given me a couple of "unrequested harddrive >interrupt errors". > >Our computer Vendor is trying to tell us that you can not install unix >and dos on the same drive, or possibly that dos can not take up more than >9% of the drive. I find this hard to believe. If Dos and unix are on >different partitions, it shouldn't matter. > >Is using Dos and unix on the same drive common? Can you do this? I'd like >to hear about your experience with doing this. > My PC at home is setup with 120MB of UNIX V 3.2.3 and 32MB of DOS 3.3. I initialized the HDU upon booting/loading the UNIX foundation set and requested the above mentioned partitions; I finished loading UNIX, did a UNIX version of FDISK, switched to the DOS partition, formatted it with the OS, loaded my apps, and voila! In addition, I loaded Simultask on the UNIX partition, loaded DOS (same version), and did a 'dosslice' so that I can run DOS apps resident on the DOS partition from the DOS emulator on the UNIX partition. I have had no problems. I have seen troubles with DOS 4.0 in the following scenarios: 1) the machine had 'antique' BIOS 2) the DOS was for a different machine (Compaq DOS on an ALR, e.g.) -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Carlo Milono: cmilono@netcom.apple.com or apple!netcom!cmilono | |"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, | |that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." - Jonathan Swift | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+