Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:7962 comp.sys.mac.misc:10264
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!olivea!oliveb!veritas!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Open Letter to an MS-DOS User
Message-ID: <1991Mar28.235320.10269@amd.com>
Date: 28 Mar 91 23:53:20 GMT
References: <1991Mar28.173225.4282@amd.com> <4123@uakari.primate.wisc.edu>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 20

bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral) writes:

>From article <1991Mar28.173225.4282@amd.com>, by phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai):
>> jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle) writes:
>>>on a daily basis. For instance, compare Pagemaker on a 16Mhz 68030 Mac and
>>>a 16Mhz 80386 PC, or for any medium level CAD/illustration program on the PC to
>> 
>> You mean a 1-bit 512x340 display vs a 4-bit 800x600 display?
>> 
>> Gee, I wonder why a tiny mac can redraw its screen so fast...

>As you yourself have said in another context:  "read what was written".

>Do you see anything above that rules out a non-512x340 screen or a color
>display?

Sure, we all know how common those color macs with big screens are.

--
Gun control is elitist.