Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!think.com!linus!agate!ucbvax!ucsd!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!zardoz.cpd.com!dhw68k!mrx
From: mrx@dhw68k.cts.com (Mark Murphy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: Are people using HyperCard 2.0?
Message-ID: <1991Mar26.002701.13930@dhw68k.cts.com>
Date: 26 Mar 91 00:27:01 GMT
Article-I.D.: dhw68k.1991Mar26.002701.13930
References: <1991Mar23.232149.8636@agate.berkeley.edu>
Distribution: ca
Organization: Wolfskill & Dowling residence; Anaheim, CA (USA)
Lines: 20

In article <1991Mar23.232149.8636@agate.berkeley.edu> thom@garnet.berkeley.edu (Thom Gillespie) writes:
>
>I ask this question because as I look around Berkeley's campus, I can't find
>any labs which are using it. They are still using the HC 1.x stuff for the
>most part. Is this because of all the stacks from 'before'? System problems or
>what?

   I'm using it to do projects at work.  I have made the completely made the
switch from HC 1.2.x to HC 2.0v2.  I'm not concerned about being compatible
with HC 1.2.x and earlier because I control which version of HC people use
here at work.  Most of the XCMDs still work... and those that don't have either
been upgraded or are on their way to being upgraded.  HC 2.0 is a really good
environment to work in.


-- 
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Real Life: Mark F. Murphy         | What kinda beer do you like?           |
|   The Net: mrx@dhw68k.cts.com     | Heineken!?  Intercourse that doo-doo!! |
| The Desktop BBS: 714-491-1003     | Pabst Blue Ribbon!!!                   |