Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!goya!turia!esink
From: esink@turia.dit.upm.es (Eric Wayne Sink)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Experience with GCC on MPW?
Message-ID: <1991Mar26.123615.2390@dit.upm.es>
Date: 26 Mar 91 12:36:15 GMT
Article-I.D.: dit.1991Mar26.123615.2390
References: <RENSING.91Mar20140712@pixel.SLAC.Stanford.EDU> <3101@mtecv2.mty.itesm.mx> <1991Mar21.174731.29262@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: @dit.upm.es
Reply-To: esink@turia.UUCP (Eric Wayne Sink)
Distribution: comp
Organization: dit
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: turia.dit.upm.es

In article <1991Mar21.174731.29262@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner) writes:
>I've looked at gcc for MPW.  It's a drop-in replacement for the C
>compiler; You still need the C glue and libraries, so it won't save
>you any money.

Is it not true that APDA sells the interfaces and libraries for MPW
as a separate product (for a LOT less than MPW C) ?

Eric


Eric W. Sink                     | Putting the phrase      |All opinions
Departamento de Telematica       | "Frequently Asked"      |are mine and
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid| in your kill file is    |not necessarily
esink@turia.dit.upm.es           | not recommended.        |yours.