Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!gatech!mcnc!rti!bnrunix!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request
From: cd@sei.cmu.edu (Chas DiFatta)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: vmstat(1) on a 4/490, trustworthy?
Keywords: Software
Message-ID: <2033@brchh104.bnr.ca>
Date: 21 Mar 91 21:31:00 GMT
Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 6
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Original-Date: 13 Mar 91 19:56:20 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 59, message 3
X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu

We have a 4/490 that's *very* heavily overloaded by bulk NFS traffic, X
terminal sessions, etc etc.  Does anyone know if vmstat(1) can be trusted
to give some type of reasonable representation of virtual memory
statistics.  The OS version is 4.1_PSR_A.

Chas DiFatta					chas@sei.cmu.edu