Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!overload!dillon From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga 3000UX, X, OpenLook, Motif, Color, A2410, Etc. (somewhat long) Message-ID: Date: 22 Mar 91 18:14:17 GMT References: <19986@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1991Mar20.100122.1717@kessner.denver.co.us> <1991Mar20.211652.3247@kessner.denver.co.us> <9K5AC+2@xds13.ferranti.com> Organization: Not an Organization Lines: 28 In article <9K5AC+2@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >In article <1991Mar20.211652.3247@kessner.denver.co.us> david@kessner.denver.co.us (David D. Kessner) writes: >> Keep in mind that 38400 baud is a realistic rate on a UNIX system-- where >> high speed modems are the norm. Todays 9600 baud modems have V.42bis that >> can do 4:1 compression on text-- requiring that you lock the modem's baud rate >> at 38400 baud... Then you throw V.42bis with V.32bis and you have a bigger >> nightmare... > >I don't get it. Why put compression on the modem, when the UNIX box can do >a better job at it (after all, it's got the whle file to examine), and put >all this interrupt handling on the UNIX box when the modem is better at it? >Doesn't make sense to me. >-- >Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com >+1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?" You are quite right, UNIX already compresses news, for example, and the big problem with UUCP right now is the fact that it handshakes each file (at a minimum), meaning that lots-o-little files (email) take a while whether you use compression or not. -Matt -- Matthew Dillon dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US 891 Regal Rd. uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon Berkeley, Ca. 94708 USA