Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!tscs!tct!chip From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Market share of Xenix/UNIX Message-ID: <27E97496.321@tct.uucp> Date: 22 Mar 91 03:05:57 GMT References: <1991Mar10.165108.8145@pegasus.com> <1991Mar19.193429.5629@kithrup.COM> <383@metran.UUCP> Organization: Teltronics/TCT, Sarasota, FL Lines: 27 According to jay@metran.UUCP (Jay Ts): >I don't know; I'm vulnerable to whatever I hear or read, but it seems that >Interactive and the other UNIX resellers have done quite well. They were >first to put real UNIX on the PC ... Sigh. XENIX *is* real UNIX. A distinct flavor from System V, yes; but real UNIX nonetheless. Not standard? Ha! Back when I used Xenix/386 2.3 as my everyday programming environment, my standard programmer's reference book was the SVID. I'd go back to XENIX today, in fact, if not for (1) the unique object file format, (2) the antique V7 filesystem, and (3) no NFS. >Because of this situation, many companies may migrate from Xenix 286 to >ISC, ESIX or some other vendor's UNIX. Quite true. On the other hand, SCO has some markets locked up -- not because of technical brilliance, but because of marketing. It's not called "the market" for nothing. -- Chip Salzenberg at Teltronics/TCT , "All this is conjecture of course, since I *only* post in the nude. Nothing comes between me and my t.b. Nothing." -- Bill Coderre