Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: ESIX and Caching Motherboards
Message-ID: <1991Mar28.212135.10688@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 28 Mar 91 21:21:35 GMT
References: <824@oss670.UUCP>
Organization: NSTAR Unix Conferencing System - 8 lines - 1400 newsgroups
Lines: 17

tkevans@oss670.UUCP (Tim Evans) writes:

>A photocopied "review" of ESIX System V, Rev D, which Everex
>sends out in its ESIX information package to prospective buyers
>contains the following statement:

>	"Our Acer's 32kb onboard cache must be disabled for
>	proper installation.  The same is probably true for
>	other machines with caches."

>Is this statement true?  Does anyone have any comments about this?

what good is a cache if it has to be disabled :)
-- 
   Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287 (HST/PEP/V.32/v.42bis)
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}