Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw From: padgett%tccslr.dnet@uvs1.orl.mmc.com (Padgett Peterson) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: STONED Problems (PC) Message-ID: <0008.9103251532.AA25003@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 21 Mar 91 21:44:18 GMT Sender: Virus Discussion List Lines: 31 Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu Recently a number of people have mentioned STONED infections trashing hard disks & think that the following is why. Today, nearly every partitioning software aligns the partitions on even track boundarys for simplicity. Since the Partition Table resides on track (cyl) 0 head 0 sector 1, the balance of this track is usually left alone and the first partion starts on the next track. However, this is just convension and not a requirement. In fact FDISK 1.00 which came with DOS 2.x began the first partition on track 0 head 0 sector 2 and has no "hidden" sectors. Since DOS version 3.0 came out in 1984, the later convension has been followed and Norton's DI usually reports 17 "hidden" sectors (all of track 0 head 0). STONED does not bother to check and just copies the original partition table code to track 0 head 0 sector 7. No problem if this is a "hidden" sector but disastrous (to DOS) if not. THIS IS REPAIRABLE. DOS keep two copies of the FAT (which STONED just overwrote) and several utilities exist (Norton Disk Doctor is one) that will copy #2 onto #1 if some utility (like CHKDSK/F) hasn't corrupted the second copy. It can also be fixed manually by someone with a bit of experience. Consequently, I suspect that those experiencing FAT-type problems had the misfortune to have a drive that was partitioned using "old" software and then became infected with STONED. Padgett