Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.misc:10271 comp.windows.ms:10927 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!gn.ecn.purdue.edu!jess From: jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: give me solid facts: why is the mac better than MeSsy DOS/WINDOWS Message-ID: <1991Mar29.034441.25349@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> Date: 29 Mar 91 03:44:41 GMT References: <23195@as0c.sei.cmu.edu> <1991Mar28.180115.22140@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Mar29.002307.9456@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network Lines: 28 In article <1991Mar29.002307.9456@agate.berkeley.edu> korpela@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu (Eric J. Korpela) writes: >In article <23195@as0c.sei.cmu.edu> bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson) writes: >> The other thing I like about the MAC is >>Excel, or Powerpoint (etc.) the MAC only displays the open document and uses >>a single command bar for all applications that are loaded. > >Actually, I find that one of the most annoying Macintosh traits. Everything >wants to use the whole damn screen. In MS windows I can be programming in one >window while looking at reference docs in another, while glancing over at >an ASCII table in another, while looking at the number that has just popped up >in the calculator. I don't have to click in the upper right corner to change >apps. > >IMHO, multifinder doesn't come close to MS windows when it comes to running >multiple apps. Maybe if you have a 19 inch screen it's a bit better, but >not even God can afford one of those. (Hell, even a 16 inch Mac monitor is >out of his price range. And color? You might as well forget it.) > > /\ korpela@ssl.berkeley.edu Internet > /__\ rioch BKYAST::KORPELA 42215::KORPELA DecNet > / \ of Chaos korpela%bkyast@ucbjade Bitnet > (_____________________ What's wrong with running programs all over the screen on a Mac like you say you do under windows and simply clicking once on the window you want to make active? Jess Holle