Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!bwdls58!mlord
From: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland C++ runtime confusion
Message-ID: <6263@bwdls58.bnr.ca>
Date: 27 Mar 91 00:51:34 GMT
References: <1991Mar17.194540.458@athena.cs.uga.edu>
Sender: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca
Reply-To: mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord)
Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 26

In article <1991Mar17.194540.458@athena.cs.uga.edu> mcovingt@athena.cs.uga.edu (Michael A. Covington) writes:
<I think I figured out what might be going on. If it's like other Borland
<products, there is no extra charge to distribute software compiled with
<their compiler, BUT if you want to possess the SOURCE code to the runtime
<library (for purposes of modifying it or writing programs that depend on
<its inmost details), you can buy THAT for about $150 more.

Speaking of things that sound very un-Borlandish.. has anyone else
read their latest (BC++) "no nonsense licence agreement".. lots of silly
stuff in there nowadays..  For example, If I distribute a program compiled
with BC++, which contains the binary form of one or more library routines,
or even just the startup code (contained in ALL compiled programs unless
one goes to the bother of rewriting it from scratch), then I am "required"
to visibly copyright my program !!!  But they do not say what form of 
copyright is required, so perhaps I can get away with:

	(c) Mark S. Lord -- all rights waived

I like to give my code away, not restrict its usage!!
-- 
MLORD@BNR.CA  Ottawa, Ontario *** Personal views only ***
begin 644 NOTSHARE.COM ; Free MS-DOS utility - use instead of SHARE.EXE
MZQ.0@/P/=`J`_!9T!2[_+H``L/_/+HX&+`"T2<TAO@,!OX0`N1(`C,B.P/.DS
<^K@A-<TAB1Z``(P&@@"ZA`"X(27-(?NZE@#-)P#-5
``
end