Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines From: rws@expo.lcs.mit.EDU (Bob Scheifler) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: xstuff: could be improved ? Message-ID: <9103272008.AA07951@expire.lcs.mit.edu> Date: 27 Mar 91 20:08:31 GMT References: <1991Mar26.082611.9783@siesoft.co.uk> Sender: tytso@athena.mit.edu (Theodore Y. Ts'o) Organization: The Internet Lines: 48 I have had the same problems with xstuff, I get no response for days and then finally I get a bounced message with something like "expo refused connection for 3 days". I don't believe that's the same problem at all, actually. Another whinge is the out-of-date (or incomplete) nature of the indexes that xstuff provides, or at least of the extremely limited number of files which it tells me that it has available. I don't think xstuff is out of date. It is extremely limited, basically limited to public MIT fixes and Consortium public review documents. How much stuff can I actually get hold of through the xstuff server ? Very little. I would really like to be able to get hold of things like a totally current ICCCM, The R4 distribution has a "totally current ICCCM". I don't want to clog the mail system with huge volumes of source code, just keep informed on developments. If by "developments" you mean Consortium-published documents, the xstuff server does provide public review documents. I realize that xstuff is a public service facility, and is provided as a concession and not a right. It is provided because the software already existed, and it was relatively painless to get set up. But it would be much more useful to non-ftp'ers like myself either if more information was available on its facilities, or if it was able to provide me with a more comprehensive base of retrievable information. Of that I have no doubt. You are welcome to encourage some site that shadows our ftp tree to make the information available by mail. You are welcome to write a bunch of new software to do what you desire, debug it for a while on a real database, and make sure it is secure, that it is reasonably robust, and that it is designed with a built-in load limiter. Make the software freely available, and we'll see about using it.