Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!helios!zeus.tamu.edu!msw1633 From: msw1633@zeus.tamu.edu (WHITSITT, MARK STEVEN) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Primary colors in human color vision Summary: A little more information Message-ID: <13701@helios.TAMU.EDU> Date: 25 Mar 91 06:38:12 GMT References: <00945FE5.1F9B5480@aclcb.purdue.edu> <1991Mar23.193006.22992@pinhead.pegasus.com> <1991Mar24.002117.24100@medisg.Stanford.EDU> Sender: usenet@helios.TAMU.EDU Reply-To: msw1633@zeus.tamu.edu Organization: Texas A&M University Lines: 26 News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4 In article <1991Mar24.002117.24100@medisg.Stanford.EDU>, vangeldr@cmgm.Stanford.EDU (Russ Van Gelder) writes... >.... Equally intriguing is understanding how the cone >pigments "tune" the retinal; it is the same photoisomerization of >11-cis retinal to all trans which is the essential act of >photoreception in all three cone rhodopsins. Something about the >particular side-chains in the vicinity of the retinal must influence >the absorption spectrum of the molecule; Jeremy Nathans (who worked >out much of the molecular biology and genetics of human color vision) >has been making site-directed mutants of the color opsins and thinks >that the relative localization of charge on the retinal is responsible >for its spectral absorbance. The idea that the opsin side chains "tune" the retinal then suggests many interesting variations on color perception. Consider an individual "A" having a mutation in one of his/her opsins which tunes the retinal differently than that of individual "B". Would placing A's eyes in B make B see colors differently than he/she did before? That is, would a familiar shade of, say, red, be perceived as a different shade of "red" with respect to the color individual B was accustomed to? What do ya think? Mark S. Whitsitt, N5RJF Texas A&M University, Dept of Biochemistry Bitnet: MSW1633@TAMSIGMA College Station, Tx. 77843-2128 Internet: MSW1633@SIGMA.TAMU.EDU (409) 845-0832 "You can't throw darts when you're empty, man" -- another Schadelism