Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!apple!veritas!amdcad!amdcad!military
From: anthony@cs.uq.oz.au
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Carrier complement
Message-ID: <1991Mar25.064829.29213@amd.com>
Date: 25 Mar 91 06:48:29 GMT
References: <1991Mar18.003254.22730@cbnews.att.com> <1991Mar23.061744.5212@amd.com>
Sender: military@amd.com
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 17
Approved: military@amd.com



From: anthony@cs.uq.oz.au

In <1991Mar23.061744.5212@amd.com> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes:
:The F-18 is [...]
:grossly inferior to the A-6 or A-7 as a subsonic bomber due to
                                ^^^
Are you sure about this, I am sure I read somewhere that the F-18 has
a bigger payload then the A-7 ?

	[Definitive answers only, please; preferably with a reference. --CDR]

--
Anthony Lee (Michaelangelo teenage mutant ninja turtle) (Time Lord Doctor) 
email: anthony@cs.uq.oz.au			    TEL:+(61)-7-365-2697 (w)
SNAIL: Dept Comp. Science, University of Qld, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia