Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!ucivax!orion.oac.uci.edu!teri.bio.uci.edu!efong From: efong@teri.bio.uci.edu (Eugene Fong) Newsgroups: bionet.neuroscience Subject: Re: Is bionet.neuroscience on the air? Message-ID: <27F8AD6A.6168@orion.oac.uci.edu> Date: 2 Apr 91 16:12:26 GMT References: <1991Apr1.040100.6772@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1991Apr1.142314.6211@njitgw.njit.edu> <1991Apr2.062447.1876@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> Reply-To: efong@teri.bio.uci.edu (Eugene Fong) Distribution: bionet.neuroscience Organization: University of California, Irvine Lines: 27 Nntp-Posting-Host: teri.bio.uci.edu In article <1991Apr2.062447.1876@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, mathew@jane.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Mathew Yeates) writes: |> > |> >PS: Anybody into neuro imaging? |> > |> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |> |> now that you mention it .... |> |> How can I tell from a CT how much damage has been done to the brain of |> an aneurism patient. What do I look for? |> |> Also, what are the relative merits of CT, PET, SPECT and MRI? Can |> anything important be learned besides what is available in a CT? |> |> Finally, can the patients prospect for a recovery be determined from |> any of the above tests? (the patient is a relative) |> |> Thanks |> |> Mathew Yeates |> mathew@jane.jpl.nasa.gov Speaking about imaging does anyone do quantitative measures of brain volume from MRI scans. This would be very useful in noting the amount of atrophy present -- Eugene Fong