Xref: utzoo alt.fax:1183 comp.dcom.fax:210
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!wolit
From: wolit@cbnewsm.att.com (Jan Wolitzky)
Newsgroups: alt.fax,comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Plain-paper fax: inkjet vs. laser
Keywords: Panafax UF-300
Message-ID: <1991Apr2.164907.17170@cbnewsm.att.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 16:49:07 GMT
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 14

I'm looking for a plain-paper fax machine for relatively low-volume
work, and am considering the Panafax UF-300 inkjet machine instead
of the more expensive laser machines.

Does anyone have any experience with these, and any recommendations
or caveats?  How much do you give up, in terms of resolution,
reliability, convenience, etc., by going with inkjet instead of
laser technology?

-- 
Jan Wolitzky, AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ; 908 582-2998
          att!mhuxd!wolit or jan.wolitzky@att.com
   (Affiliation given for identification purposes only)
           Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.