Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!tmpmbx!scuzzy!src
From: src@scuzzy.in-berlin.de (Heiko Blume)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: V.32bis and V.17 approved by CCITT
Message-ID: <1991Apr01.145238.13310@scuzzy.in-berlin.de>
Date: 1 Apr 91 14:52:38 GMT
References: <7125.27F41B87@zswamp.fidonet.org>
Organization: Contributed Software
Lines: 13

root@zswamp.fidonet.org (Geoffrey Welsh) writes:
>   Given that design criteria, it's damned silly that the HST can't carry 
>UUCP-g at all well.  You're right that 350 CPS is ridiculous for a 9600 bps 
>modem.

well, it wasn't designed for uucp, so you can't really blame it.
however, if you use the f-protocol for uucp you'll get nice throughput.
with a HST 14400/V.42bis i get ~1800 cps on average.
-- 
   Heiko Blume <-+-> src@scuzzy.in-berlin.de <-+-> (+49 30) 691 88 93 [voice!]
                  public UNIX source archive [HST V.42bis]:
        scuzzy Any ACU,f 38400 6919520 gin:--gin: nuucp sword: nuucp
                     uucp scuzzy!/src/README /your/home