Xref: utzoo rec.audio:30310 comp.dsp:1490
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!gvgpsa!gold.gvg.tek.com!chrisc
From: chrisc@gold.gvg.tek.com (Chris Christensen)
Newsgroups: rec.audio,comp.dsp
Subject: Re: Good speaker + DSP == perfect speaker?
Message-ID: <2107@gold.gvg.tek.com>
Date: 29 Mar 91 23:38:48 GMT
References: <1991Mar22.171203.8665@sco.COM> <1991Mar27.042821.14392@cinnet.com>
Followup-To: rec.audio
Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA
Lines: 21

In article <1991Mar27.042821.14392@cinnet.com> eric@cinnet.com (Eric Bardes)
writes:
>
>It is a nifty idea.  Run enough DSP to counteract defects in the speaker
>and room, BUT ...  What about the response curve of the microphone?
>

Do us (recording engineers) a favor and don't try and correct microphone 
response curves!  

I guess the real  question is how would you compensate for the Microphones
response?  

Even the minimalists may use two or three different types of
microphones for Classical recordings.

Just my 2 cents worth.  

Asbestos suit on.!

Chris Christensen