Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: What's WRONG with Forth?
Message-ID: <2562.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 30 Mar 91 03:12:39 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 22

Category 2,  Topic 9
Message 87        Thu Mar 28, 1991
ATFURMAN [Alan F.]           at 22:31 PST
 
Charles Eaker, replying to Dave Lowry, writes:

 > > It just seems to me that Forth is too "powerful" for its own good.
 >
 > Forth may be too dangerous for your tastes, which means, I suppose,
 > that you may feel insecure in some way when you use it.

And then there's always the Royal Hospital for People Who Redefine 1 To Be 2.

:-)

===========================================================================
        "This disclaimer is strictly the author's personal opinion."
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp