Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven!adm!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
Message-ID: <530:Mar3122:12:3391@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 31 Mar 91 22:12:33 GMT
References: <1991Mar27.161304.17666@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Mar28.124634.28106@mathrt0.math.chalmers.se> <1991Mar29.012352.23889@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: IR
Lines: 28

In article <1991Mar29.012352.23889@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> quale@saavik.cs.wisc.edu (Douglas E. Quale) writes:
> Dan Bernstein doesn't believe that programs written in languages with dynamic
> typing are shorter than those written in C.

When did I say that?

Doug, are you capable of correctly paraphrasing anything I've ever said?

---Dan

Path: kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
Message-ID: <3352:Mar1803:04:5491@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: Mon Mar 18 03:04:54 GMT 1991
References: <693@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
Organization: IR
Lines: 8

In article <693@optima.cs.arizona.edu> gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) writes:
> Programs in
> dynamically typed languages are generally half to a tenth the size of
> programs in statically typed languages that do the same thing.

I don't believe you. Give an example.

---Dan