Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!paperboy!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff From: jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme Subject: Re: Whither Headeth Scheme? Message-ID: <4376@skye.ed.ac.uk> Date: 28 Mar 91 19:32:05 GMT References: <3604@dali> Reply-To: jeff@aiai.UUCP (Jeff Dalton) Organization: AIAI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland Lines: 26 In article pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Antonio Grandi) writes: >On 5 Mar 91 04:14:16 GMT, icsu8209@attila.cs.montana.edu (Glassy) said: > > >icsu8209> A short history of programming languages. > >icsu8209> lisp->lisp-1.5->{mac|inter}lisp->CL... >icsu8209> | >icsu8209> (rebellion) scheme->r1rs->r2rs->r3rs->r4rs... > >Not so easy! You miss on Vincennes Lisp and Wisconsin (later Maryland) >Lisp, which have been milestones too, and are direct descendants of Lisp >1.5. In particular Vincennes Lisp could, by some stretch of imagination, >be seen as an ancestor of Scheme. You also miss, in another branch, NIL. What, exactly, is the evidence that Vincennes or Wisconsin Lisp were milestones or that Vincennes was in any sense an ancestor of Scheme? Of course, there are a number of significant Lisps between Lisp 1.5 and MacLisp/InterLisp as well as at other interesting points. In particular, one might mention PDP1 Lisp and BBN Lisp on the way to Interlisp, Q-32 Lisp, Stanford Lisp 1.6 and UCI Lisp, Cambridge Lisp, PSL, Lisp/VM (and related Lisps), Le Lisp, LM/ZetaLisp, NIL, Spice Lisp, and of course Lisp 2. But in a "short history" it is not necessary to mention everything.