Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!igor!rutabaga!jls
From: jls@rutabaga.Rational.COM (Jim Showalter)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Documenting OO Systems
Message-ID: <jls.670284401@rutabaga>
Date: 29 Mar 91 22:06:41 GMT
References: <jls.669768656@rutabaga> <299@orbit.gtephx.UUCP> 	<1991Mar25.145441.1@happy.colorado.edu> <20106@alice.att.com> 	<3481@engadm3.csd.mot.com> <DWWX.91Mar25215016@cbnewsk.ATT.COM> 	<jls.669956827@rutabaga> <1991Mar26.191259.14470@i88.isc.com> 	<4693@osc.COM>
Sender: news@Rational.COM
Distribution: comp
Lines: 10

>> ...finally you just have to accept that C++ is far from a WYSIWYG
>> language.

>Precisely.  If you want a "real" WYSIWIG language, use assembler.

Nah, too high-level. Work exclusively in microcode. :-)
--
***** DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are my own, except in
      the realm of software engineering, in which case I've borrowed
      them from incredibly smart people.