Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!moxie!sugar!ficc!taronga!peter
From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Caller ID problems
Message-ID: <0YT2JNG@taronga.hackercorp.com>
Date: 31 Mar 91 20:35:24 GMT
References: <13948@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Organization: A corner of our bedroom
Lines: 10

byron@archone.tamu.edu (Byron Rakitzis) writes:
> I don't see how per-call blocking is a nice compromise, either. It rather
> defeats the purpose of caller ID, don't you think?

Not at all. There is already one box on the market that blocks calls that
block caller-ID.
-- 
               (peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com)
   `-_-'
    'U`