Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!moxie!sugar!ficc!taronga!peter
From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Caller ID problems
Message-ID: <1YT2BPG@taronga.hackercorp.com>
Date: 31 Mar 91 20:36:25 GMT
References: <19139@rpp386.cactus.org>
Organization: A corner of our bedroom
Lines: 11

jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II) writes:
> The best approach does seem to be the feature which lets you turn off
> caller ID when you originate the call and which allows you to suppress
> any calls which have caller ID turned off when you receive calls.

Yes, this seems to be the reasonable compromise. Now we only have to get
the PUCs and the LECs to act reasonably. Piece of cake, right? Right?
-- 
               (peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com)
   `-_-'
    'U`