Xref: utzoo alt.privacy:106 comp.org.eff.talk:1891
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!oliveb!amdahl!JUTS!jfh20
From: jfh20@ccc.amdahl.com (Jack Hamilton)
Newsgroups: alt.privacy,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Telephone Caller ID's
Message-ID: <68mV029.06kD01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 19:42:41 GMT
References: <1991Mar29.154847.16915@engin.umich.edu> <1991Apr1.035451.25308@netcom.COM> <27F6FC7F.3E44@ibma0.cs.uiuc.edu> <1991Apr1.181048.21377@odin.corp.sgi.com>
Reply-To: jfh20@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 5

Perhaps the rules have changed, but it used to be Pacific Bell's policy
to supply, on demand, the name and address associated with charge on your
phone bill.  Have a number you want to know about?  Make a non-local call
to it, and when the bill comes, call the phone company and say "Who was
this call to?"  The unlisted number restrictions don't apply.