Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!karl From: karl@ficc.ferranti.com (Karl Lehenbauer) Subject: Re: EFF Chapters Message-ID: <9RGA6JD@xds12.ferranti.com> Keywords: EFF college academia chapters Reply-To: karl@ficc.ferranti.com (Karl Lehenbauer) Organization: Ferranti International Controls Corporation References: <1991Mar19.213148.14254@vpnet.chi.il.us> <669491914.4141@mindcraft.com> <7846@hsv3.UUCP> <1991Mar26.164325.2631@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Apr1.061003.18924@isis.cs.du.edu> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 91 19:15:04 GMT In article <1991Apr1.061003.18924@isis.cs.du.edu> swoodcoc@isis.UUCP (Steven Markus Woodcock) writes: > With all due respect, Mr. Bates, your organization lost MY respect when >it came down against the SDI concept, favoring the demonstrably amoral >M.A.D. doctrine over M.A.S. (Mutually Assured Survival). > > --Steven M. Woodcock > SDI Simulations Engineer > Senior Software Engineer > National Test Bed With SDI, survival is neither "mutual" nor "assured". You are either telling the Big Lie, that such a shield would be impenetrable, or you are optimistic or oblivious to a level approaching religious fanaticism. While I won't go so far as to say "It can't work", it's not too difficult to conclude "it won't work perfectly", i.e. lots of people and places will still get vaporized, perhaps enough to bring down civilization. Some of you SDI guys have pointed to the phone system as a huge, networked application that doesn't crash. Well, it pretty much did crash, and furthermore it is continually being used, affording lots of opportunities for discovering and fixing problems. You'll never have a real SDI test of the magnitude of the one where it'll have to actually work or dire consequences will result, hardly "assured survival." -- -- Have computer, will travel. Same old story, same old song; Come to Texas for the it goes all right till it goes all wrong. chili that burns twice!! -- Will Jennings