Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!utkcs2!nall
From: nall@cs.utk.edu (John Nall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources
Message-ID: <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu>
Date: 29 Mar 91 13:31:50 GMT
References: <49029@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com>
Sender: usenet@cs.utk.edu (USENET News Poster)
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
Lines: 18

In article <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:

     [information about voting, etc., deleted]

>The overwhelming
>preference seems to be for an unmoderated subgroup in any case...
>-- 
     Well, I'm not sure on what basis the conclusion is made, but since
     it jibes with my own preference, I'm willing to accept it on faith :-)

     Does this mean, then, that the vote will be strictly an up/down vote
     on whether to have an unmoderated subgroup or to not have one???

>Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
>+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"

John Nall
nall@rigel.cs.utk.edu