Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!ria!csd.uwo.ca!webber
From: webber@csd.uwo.ca (Robert E. Webber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Various & Sundry questions....FLAMMABLE!
Message-ID: <2604@ria.ccs.uwo.ca>
Date: 29 Mar 91 23:31:21 GMT
References: <49236@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Sender: news@ria.ccs.uwo.ca
Organization: see disclaimer
Lines: 12

In article <49236@nigel.ee.udel.edu> KENC@vaxb.acs.unt.edu (Ken Corey, CSCI Major...) writes:
.
.  Cripes!  I thought Minix was a pretty complete OS, but GADS, it's not
.ANYTHING like the Unix I'm reading about....it's VERY true that it's strictly
.Unix-like...;)  

The main difference between minix and current unix systems is that
minix was intended to be coherent and understandable.  Commercial
unix vendors have never felt constained to sell a system that a
single person could actually look at and say that it works.

---- BOB (webber@csd.uwo.ca)