Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!vancleef
From: vancleef@iastate.edu (Van Cleef Henry H)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources
Summary: I vote unmoderated
Message-ID: <1991Mar31.080046.18150@news.iastate.edu>
Date: 31 Mar 91 08:00:46 GMT
References: <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com>
Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
Lines: 11

In article <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Unless someone fill my mailbox in the next two weeks. I personally
>prefer the idea of a moderated group, and have two volunteers, but
>the traffic on this group indicates it's not the preferred arrangement.
>-- 
Why are we talking "moderated?"  The only reason I have heard for this
is "everybody else is doing it" for source files. My whole feeling is
that this voting is all to "fix" something that is working.

--