Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uflorida!gatech!utkcs2!nall
From: nall@cs.utk.edu (John Nall)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources
Message-ID: <1991Mar31.132500.28795@cs.utk.edu>
Date: 31 Mar 91 13:25:00 GMT
References: <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com>
Sender: usenet@cs.utk.edu (USENET News Poster)
Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department
Lines: 18

In article <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> nall@cs.utk.edu (John Nall) writes:
>>      Does this mean, then, that the vote will be strictly an up/down vote
>>      on whether to have an unmoderated subgroup or to not have one???
>
>Unless someone fill my mailbox in the next two weeks. I personally
>prefer the idea of a moderated group, and have two volunteers, but
>the traffic on this group indicates it's not the preferred arrangement.

     Good, that is what I had hoped it meant.  In that case, I will
     vote against it, since as someone has pointed out, it "ain't broke,
     so why fix it?".   Since the traffic on this group has indicated
     that only the up/down vote is desired, perhaps further traffic can
     indicate that the down would prevail, and then we would not have to
     have a vote at all, verdad?  :-)

John Nall