Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!bu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!star.cs.vu.nl!ast
From: ast@cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Nomenclature
Message-ID: <9524@star.cs.vu.nl>
Date: 2 Apr 91 10:58:16 GMT
References: <9488@star.cs.vu.nl> <9103303866@minixug.mugnet.org> <71FA.8@xds13.ferranti.com>
Sender: news@cs.vu.nl
Organization: Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines: 14

In article <71FA.8@xds13.ferranti.com> peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
>	Part 1: should there be a non-moderated sources group as a
>	companion to the existing comp.os.minix?
>
>	Part 2: The name of this group should be:

Is it legal to to vote No on 1 and still vote on 2?  Is this ethical?
I'm going to vote no on the split, but if everyone else wants it, I am
inclined to put my two cents in on the name and vote for comp.os.minix.code
with .software as second choice.


Andy Tanenbaum (ast@cs.vu.nl)