Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!philabs!ttidca!clark
From: clark@ttidca.TTI.COM (Ralph Clark)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources
Message-ID: <25259@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Date: 3 Apr 91 05:06:50 GMT
References: <AFBAJZ6@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> <KKCAH51@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Mar31.132500.28795@cs.utk.edu>
Organization: Citicorp/TTI, Santa Monica
Lines: 16

In article <1991Mar31.132500.28795@cs.utk.edu> nall@cs.utk.edu (John Nall) writes:
>
>     ...                                       In that case, I will
>     vote against it, since as someone has pointed out, it "ain't broke,
>     so why fix it?".   Since the traffic on this group has indicated
>     that only the up/down vote is desired, perhaps further traffic can
>     indicate that the down would prevail, and then we would not have to
>     have a vote at all, verdad?  :-)
>
>John Nall
> 
I completely agree.  Issuing a Request For Discussion does not mandate a
vote.  I haven't seen any support for this split from anyone who actually
posts sources.
-- 
Ralph Clark (clark@ttidca.tti.com) {csun|philabs|psivax}!ttidca!clark