Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: RFD: comp.sources.minix moderated or comp.os.minix.sources Message-ID: Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC References: <1991Mar29.133150.13165@cs.utk.edu> <1991Mar31.132500.28795@cs.utk.edu> <25259@ttidca.TTI.COM> Date: Wed, 3 Apr 91 18:09:44 GMT In article <25259@ttidca.TTI.COM> clark@ttidca.TTI.COM (Ralph Clark) writes: > I completely agree. Issuing a Request For Discussion does not mandate a > vote. I haven't seen any support for this split from anyone who actually > posts sources. It's the people who want to *use* the sources I'm concerned about. As an alternative, do you suppose all the people who post sources could be convinced to add "Archive-name:" entries as the first line of their messages? I don't. But I do see a need for some such mechanism to separate the wheat from the chaff. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"