Xref: utzoo news.groups:29858 comp.sources.d:6732
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: RESULT:  comp.sources.reviewed passes 270:54
Message-ID: <29278:Apr215:39:3191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 2 Apr 91 15:39:31 GMT
References: <4!.g+#m@rpi.edu>
Organization: IR
Lines: 18

In article <4!.g+#m@rpi.edu> andrew@calvin.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick) writes:
> Therefore, comp.sources.reviewed passes and will be added as a
> newsgroup.

Okay, anyone for bets on exactly how this group will fail?

Will it remain embroiled in discussion about the reviewing process? Will
the moderator give up in disgust? Will the reviewers fail to accomplish
anything in a reasonable amount of time? Will one of the first ten
packages through the group crash miserably or destroy files? Will USENET
go down the tubes with the volume of complaints about the slowness of
comp.sources.reviewed? Will postings mysteriously fail to materialize at
any archive sites? Or will people simply ignore a group which achieves
no useful purpose?

There are lots of juicy possibilities. I vote for all of them.

---Dan