Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Keyboards (was Re: Wake Up Commodore!)
Message-ID: <1991Mar29.182110.4582@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Date: 29 Mar 91 18:21:10 GMT
References: <N&2-=9%@irie.ais.org> <20124@cbmvax.commodore.com> <VINSCI.91Mar28212240@nic.nic.funet.fi>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
Lines: 13

In article <VINSCI.91Mar28212240@nic.nic.funet.fi> vinsci@nic.funet.fi (Leonard Norrgard) writes:
> You mean VT220-ish, of course, the only sane industry standard
> keyboard.

You mean the keyboard with the "." and "," doubled, and the "<>" key between
the Z and the shift key? Bogus.

I mean VT-100-ish, the one based on the IBM Selectric, as all good keyboards
are. I keep my old Zenith 29 terminal simply because the keyboard is Selectric
style...
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.