Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Amiga OS *IS* state of the art Message-ID: <1991Mar29.183734.4729@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 29 Mar 91 18:37:34 GMT References: <1003@cbmger.UUCP> <7827@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> <1991Mar27.062345.6622@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 11 In article <1991Mar27.062345.6622@sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au> l-tarantello@adfa.oz.au (Luke Tarantello) writes: > I agree except for the last point. I don't think that the Amiga needs to > be multi-user. You don't need to have multiple users on a box to be in a multi-user environment. ANY NETWORK is a multi-user environment, and the kludges that PC network people do to deal with this (Novell actually installs a large part of a whole new O/S!) are absolutely ghastly. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .