Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT-bashing party (hit "n" if you're not interested :-))
Message-ID: <12391@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 2 Apr 91 17:54:23 GMT
References: <52f1029o06cX01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <4aQk02L406l501@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <oo2Gzzh11@cs.psu.edu> <1991Mar17.031448.26855@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <15L002.N06Qt01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <1991Mar26.043648.17656@NCoast.ORG> <2577@ria.ccs.uwo.ca> <2602@ria.ccs.uwo.
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 10

In article <2602@ria.ccs.uwo.ca> ptoper@obelix (Andy Nagy) writes:
>	Is it possible for the 68040 to use the 68882 the same way that the
>68030 to do the transcendentals?


I'm a software guy, but wasn't the co-processor line taken out of the 68040?

David Navas                                   navas@cory.berkeley.edu
	2.0 :: "You can't have your cake and eat it too."
Also try c186br@holden, c260-ay@ara and c184-ap@torus