Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!uunet!viusys!uxui!unislc!dave From: dave@unislc.uucp (Dave Martin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: GVP Acceloraters Message-ID: <1991Mar29.003740.18783@unislc.uucp> Date: 29 Mar 91 00:37:40 GMT References: <871@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM> Organization: unisys Lines: 33 From article <871@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM>, by dltaylor@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Dan Taylor): > (jason@cbmami.UUCP) > In comp.sys.amiga.hardware you write: > >> In particular, can a rev7 GVP 50 MHz run Unix? > > A3000s. When (if?) an A2500/30 version is released, someone may also > port it to GVP. I don't know if GVP could afford the $250,000 cost for > a source license and development, though. The GVP boards CAN run UNIX. > Anything that has an '030 and a couple of Meg of RAM can. It's more a > question of whether, or not, there will ever be a port. Even though > I, too, have an a2630, I'd like to see GVP provide viable alternatives > in the market. So, what is the problem with GVP boards? Just because I use Syvania light bulbs instead of Phillips light bulbs doesn't mean I should have to port my electricity. It runs AmigaDOS/EXEC right? Have they lobotomized the MMU? (difficult when its on the same chip with the cpu) Is the memory strange? Unix ported to run on a 68030 should run on a 68030. Now admittedly you could have different bus/hardware things to worry about if it were a different architecture (like running unix on a 68030 based Machintosh vs. a 68030 based Amiga). But this thing runs AmigaDOS/EXEC and somehow I dont think commodore has code that goes If GVP then boot custom EXEC; I also don't think GVP has this code either. I've never seen the GVP board, but if this is a legitimate claim (that it won't run commodore UNIX) i'd like to know what they did to achieve this. -- VAX Headroom Speaking for myself only... blah blah blahblah blah... Internet: DMARTIN@CC.WEBER.EDU dave@saltlcy-unisys.army.mil uucp: dave@unislc.uucp or use the Path: line. Now was that civilized? No, clearly not. Fun, but in no sense civilized.