Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A2091 conclusions
Message-ID: <20252@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 06:26:23 GMT
References: <18d500f6.ARN0f22@cbmami.UUCP>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 25

In article <18d500f6.ARN0f22@cbmami.UUCP> jason@cbmami.UUCP writes:
>At one point CBM Engineers routinly discused the problem and often
>suggested that reselection be turned off (which it definately is on my two
>quantum drives).  Now no CBM Engineer seems willing to utter the word
>A2091, does this mean "something is in the works don't bug us" or does it
>mean "trade in for a GVP"?  The vibes I am getting suggest the later.  

	I've been busy, and got to this group for the first time in a month
or more (as you can see by the string of postings this follows... :-)
The former is more accurate (you can start holding your breath).

>All I really want is to know where I stand and what I should do, I am not
>looking for any promises or free fixes!

	Understood.  I'm trying to be of help, and have been a champion of
all of your causes when possible.  You should see results RRSN.  Sorry, I
really can't say more yet. (and as usual, read my disclaimer)

-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is in anything other than my personal opinion.
Thus spake the Master Ninjei: "To program a million-line operating system
is easy, to change a man's temperament is more difficult."
(From "The Zen of Programming")  ;-)