Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!njin!limonce
From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli +1 201 408 5389)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re:  Lemmings - a tutorial Part IV
Message-ID: <Mar.30.20.09.02.1991.12935@pilot.njin.net>
Date: 31 Mar 91 01:09:03 GMT
References: <mykes.0440@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG> <23787@well.sf.ca.us> <mykes.0172@sega0.SF-Bay.ORG> <MWM.91Mar27123712@revelwood.pa.dec.com> <00670282706@elgamy.RAIDERNET.COM>
Organization: Drew University - Madison NJ
Lines: 10

Can we all agree to keep "use the OS"/"kill the OS" and "go to the
chips"/"call the OS" arguments in .advocacy?  I don't think this fits
in .programmer.

In article <mykes.0440@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG>, by mykes@amiga0.SF-Bay.ORG (Mike Schwartz):
> Jim Goodnow used 'C' to write his assembler (as), and HiSoft used
> Assembler language.  AS is > 50K and is a slow pig.  Devpac is 27K on
> disk and is blindingly fast.  Which is the right tool?  I don't care

A bubble sort written in assembler is still a bubble sort.