Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!att!ucbvax!CIM-VAX.HONEYWELL.COM!DERSTAD
From: DERSTAD@CIM-VAX.HONEYWELL.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re:  400t upgrade to 425t  !!FLAME!!
Message-ID: <910329130210.2476@CIM-VAX.HONEYWELL.COM>
Date: 29 Mar 91 19:02:10 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19


One other item jt left out.  The original poster implied that
new customers were getting preferential treatment over old
customers.  We got our first 425t upgrade about 10 days ago,
and we're a fairly old customer (1983 or so).

Incidentally, given what I've seen of the 425t/PSK8 combination,
you might not want it yet... We've had a lot of intermittent
problems.  I'm planning to post a list once I have time.  We're
probably going to load PSK8 on a 400t to see if it sithe
the upgrad or the OS (I'm hoping the OS on the grounds that's
easier to patch).

I'd be interested in hearing if anyone else with a 425t 
considers them somewhat unstable.

Dave Erstad
DERSTAD@cim-vax.honeywell.com
Honeywell SSEC