Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!blkcat!Usenet
From: Chip.Old@p2.f1053.n261.z1.Fidonet.Org (Chip Old)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: RE: flaming?
Message-ID: <670244757.4@blkcat.Fidonet.Org>
Date: 28 Mar 91 06:05:52 GMT
Sender: Usenet@p0.f40.n109.z1.Fidonet.Org
Lines: 18




In a message to me dated 03/25/91, you said:
 
 > Pot calling the kettle black?  In one message you so
 > self-righteously "flame" Andrew Loewenstern for "flaming."  Does
 > anyone ELSE see some hypocrisy here? 
 
As I recall, my message to Andrew suggested that he direct his complaints about
Tabby to the author (Mike Connick), and that he do it in a constructive manner.
 That's hardly a flame.
 
As for pots 'n' kettles, take a look at the other messages you posted here on
03/25/91, then decide which you are.  Hard to tell sometimes, isn't it?


 * Origin: Hitchhiking the Networks: CRABBS Point 2 (1:261/1053.2)