Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsl!cbnewsk!rob
From: rob@cbnewsk.att.com (rob)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Bernoulli or Syquest?
Message-ID: <1991Apr2.193608.11045@cbnewsk.att.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 19:36:08 GMT
References: <1991Mar29.125038.12188@pbs.org>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 23

From article <1991Mar29.125038.12188@pbs.org>, by bhall@pbs.org (Dark Star):
] 
] I am looking to add some removeable storage devices to some Macs.  The most
] basic part of the choice is "Bernoulli or Syquest?"
] ...
] ...
] 
] Has anyone had experience with the Bernoulli drives?  I am especially
] interested in how well they follow the Mac "feel" since Bernoulli got its
] start in MS/DOS land.

I have had a dual drive Bernoulli on my Mac for quite a while with no
problems. Other than the fact that the drive is 'noisy' when a disk is
inserted, I have had no problems whatsoever (oh yeah, I *did* have one
problem where one of the two drives refused to recognize that a disk was
inserted. Sent it back for warranty service and got it back, repaired, in
10 days!). The bottom line - I like it. Your milage may vary.....

.....rob
-- 
.....rob coben, currently contracted to AT&T Bell Labs, rcoben@attmail.com
rob's rule #1: If you want it bad, you're going to get it bad!
rob's rule #2: Just because you own a hammer, it doesn't make you a carpenter.