Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!ibism!ibism.UUCP!glp From: glp@ibism.UUCP (Greg Parkinson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: MacSync Message-ID: <12349@ibism.uucp> Date: 3 Apr 91 22:14:00 GMT References: <1991Mar25.125537.9640@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <12345@ibism.uucp> <9253@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Sender: news@ibism.uucp Organization: Citibank IBISM Lines: 40 In article <9253@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>, dbreiden@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Danny Breidenbach) writes: |> I tried to email, but bouncy bouncy |> |> In article <12345@ibism.uucp> glp@ibism.UUCP (Greg Parkinson) writes: |> |> >I don't think the color is as good, but I don't do much artwork/graphics, |> >so it makes little difference to me. |> |> So does the text look as good as an Apple monitor? I've seen a VGA |> hooked up to an LC on which text was very hard to read. Quite annoying |> for text intensive work. |> The main difference for me is that the colors on the Apple monitor look more enriched, and the contrast is a little better. I work on a Sparcstation 1+ all day long, and it's not as good as the Sun Monitor (which is a Sony, I think?) I've spent a lot of time with the MacSync doing word processing, chatting and foldering on AOL, etc. with no feeling of "I can't look at this anymore". |> Also, where does one look for MacSync stuff? Greg, I take it you like |> your monitor? |> Back of Mac is where I found it. I like it, yea, but if the Apple Monitor was the same price I'd buy the Apple, I think. Something I *don't* know is whether the MacSync actually gives you any more screen real estate, or just has fatter pixels or larger borders. |> --Danny -- Greg Parkinson (GregBear) Phone: 212-657-7814 Citibank Fax: 212-825-8607 111 Wall Street E-Mail: uunet!ibism!glp New York, NY 10043 The opinions expressed are my own and not those of the big 'ol bank.