Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kgw2!dennisg From: dennisg@kgw2.bwi.WEC.COM (Dennis Glatting) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: No Documentation Message-ID: <2120@kgw2.Xetron.COM> Date: 29 Mar 91 15:38:01 GMT References: <1991Mar27.104146.12808@sinix.UUCP> Sender: dennisg@kgw2.Xetron.COM Reply-To: dennisg@Xetron.COM Organization: Xetron Corporation, Cincinnati Ohio Lines: 37 In article <1991Mar27.104146.12808@sinix.UUCP>, dhg@sinix.UUCP (David Griffith) writes: |> Apparantly Steve Jobs is fond of glancing at people's products and |> pronouncing "That's shit!". Well can I be the first to complain |> that the online technical documentation supplied with 2.0 is shit? |> |> I'm surprised no-one has pointed this out before, but there is NO |> introductory developers documentation supplied with the system. So |> here I am with my nice shiny new cube and state-of-the-art software |> tools (NeXTStep, Interface Builder, Objective C, DSP) and I don't |> know how to use it! What documentation there is is very low level. |> |> Apparantly NeXT do have printed technical documentation in the |> pipeline but it's not available yet and no-one knows when it will be. |> |> So come on NeXT, pull your finger out. This is an appalling |> omission in an otherwise excellent product. |> calm down. I and my team have been writing software for NeXTs for 18 months. It is true that there should be a 2.0 concepts manual readily available but there is not. the 1.0 stuff gives one a good starting point and probably covers much of the stuff in 2.0. i've found excellent documentation on-line. for example the appkit, zones, and others. certainly the lack of docs is stiffling but, being a developer that uses leading edge technology, i have encountered this problem with other products as well but it rarely stops me. -- ..!uunet!kgw2!dennisg | Dennis P. Glatting dennisg@Xetron.COM | X2NeXT developer | NeXT/C++/Objective-C wienie