Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!att!ucbvax!iwarp.intel.com!news
From: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Finding files modified "today" (Was: Awk with passed parameters)
Keywords: awk bsd shell
Message-ID: <1991Mar29.185347.6657@iwarp.intel.com>
Date: 29 Mar 91 18:53:47 GMT
References: <3022@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil> <3450@unisoft.UUCP> <686@silence.princeton.nj.us>
Sender: news@iwarp.intel.com
Reply-To: merlyn@iwarp.intel.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Organization: Stonehenge; netaccess via Intel, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
Lines: 21
In-Reply-To: jay@silence.princeton.nj.us (Jay Plett)

In article <686@silence.princeton.nj.us>, jay@silence (Jay Plett) writes:
| I have added several primitives to gnu find and sent the sources off
| to gnu.  If gnu likes them, they should be available in a future
| release.
[...]
|      -gid n
|           File's gid matches n.
[...]
|      -uid n
|           File's uid matches n.

Whoa!  You mean that GNU find doesn't implement the standard -user and
-group, which handle numeric IDs just fine?  (Or have I been playing
with a non-V7 find for too long?)

Just another UNIX hacker,
-- 
/=Randal L. Schwartz, Stonehenge Consulting Services (503)777-0095 ==========\
| on contract to Intel's iWarp project, Beaverton, Oregon, USA, Sol III      |
| merlyn@iwarp.intel.com ...!any-MX-mailer-like-uunet!iwarp.intel.com!merlyn |
\=Cute Quote: "Intel: putting the 'backward' in 'backward compatible'..."====/