Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!turing!jon
From: jon@turing.acs.virginia.edu (Jon Gefaell)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: ESIX and Caching Motherboards
Message-ID: <1991Mar29.165800.13689@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 29 Mar 91 16:58:00 GMT
References: <824@oss670.UUCP> <1991Mar29.063058.18124@jwt.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 21

In article <1991Mar29.063058.18124@jwt.UUCP> john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples) writes:
>In article <824@oss670.UUCP> tkevans@oss670.UUCP (Tim Evans) writes:
>>	"Our Acer's 32kb onboard cache must be disabled for
>>	proper installation.  The same is probably true for
>>	other machines with caches."
>
>ESIX runs without a hitch on my cached system.  This "reviewer" is
>rather bold to make such a statement based on a sample size of one.
>-- 
>John W. Temples -- john@jwt.UUCP (uunet!jwt!john)

Same here, ALL ESIX revisions have run just fine on my 386/33 Everex
motherboard, the AGI. This has a simple FIFO cache, not a more advanced
2 way set associative cache, or whatever like AMMA or the Intel cache 
controller

--
____
\  /       		 Jon Gefaell (jon@Turing.acs.Virginia.EDU)           
 \/ The pleasure of satisfying a savage instinct, undomesticated by the ego,    is uncomparably much more intense than one of satisfying a tamed instinct.      The reason is becoming the enemy that prevents us from a lot of possibilities   of pleasure. 		
		S. Freud