Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi
From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland shafts C programmers AGAIN!
Message-ID: <1991Mar30.233224.15937@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Date: 30 Mar 91 23:32:24 GMT
References: <1991Mar30.163852.12490@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Lines: 22

From article <1991Mar30.163852.12490@sbcs.sunysb.edu>, by altman@sbpmt.cs.sunysb.edu (Jeff Altman):
> In article <1991Mar28.153150.2794@welch.jhu.edu> glenn@welchlab.welch.jhu.edu (Glenn M. Mason) writes:
> 
> I have found BC++ to be 1000 times easy to use for developing my Windows
> applications than C 6.0a and the SDK (which I own)  The upgrade price
> was worth it if only for the Whitewater Resource Toolkit (LP $199.95).  
> I will never have to look at a .RC file ever again.
> 

I wonder only one thing.  When MS comes out with their belated entry
to the C++ market, what will it come with?  What will new upgrades to
the SDK come with.  This I know, I don't really want to keep paying
for two, staggered in time, updates.  This I also know, I gotta have
the DEBUG kernels (Mr. Borland, please get these).  The last thing I
am gonna say I know is that Borland better jump real fast when
the 32-bit version stuff comes out.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|