Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!dog.ee.lbl.gov!ucbvax!alfalfa.com!nazgul From: nazgul@alfalfa.com (Information Junkie) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif Subject: Re: help w/issue re 1.0 -> 1.1 porting Message-ID: <910402153251.10822@sun> Date: 2 Apr 91 20:32:51 GMT References: <1991Mar25.112823@Unify.com> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 40 > 0. The answer to this is probably "no", but I'll ask anyway. Is > there any chance of compiling a 1.0 appl with the 1.1 toolkit > and having it work? Actually the answer is Yes. But it depends on what you've done of course. In fact I've even run 1.0 apps with the 1.1 shared libraries - although I wouldn't ever want to ship something in that configuration. > 1. What is involved with changes to the functions relating > to input focus? We currently use the 1.0 undocumented > _XmGrabTheFocus(), and need to know how the operation > of this function (or its analog) has changed with the > new toolkit. Use XmProcessTraversal and cross your fingers. > 3. Can a 1.1 application function correctly with a 1.0 window > manager (and vice versa)? _Is_ there a 1.1 window manager, > or is 1.1 just a toolkit release? 1.1 has a new Mwm. I haven't used it yet since I expect most of our customers to still have the old one. So the answer is Yes. > 4. If there is a 1.1 window manager, is any programmatic access > provided to it? No more than 1.0, as far as I know. Although I gather that at 1.0 it didn't all work correctly. > 5. Any major changes to resources? What they are called, where > they are found? Some changes wrt who frees XmStrings. > 6. Is Motif 1.1 based on X11R3 or X11R4? If it's based on R4 > can I run my application on an R3 server? R4, yes. Alfalfa Software, Inc. | Poste: The EMail for Unix nazgul@alfalfa.com | Send Anything... Anywhere 617/646-7703 (voice/fax) | info@alfalfa.com I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.